Medtech1.com: Great Information, Real Community, Better Living.
 Register
 Login
 Main Page
 MedTech News
Tech & Innovation
Living With a Device
 Education Center
Diagnostic Tests
Conditions
Procedures
Women's Health
Companies
Online Resources
Video Library
Dr. Christopher Kwolek  MedTech  Hero™
Dr. Christopher Kwolek:
Pioneering New Blood Clot Treatments.
About Heroes
 Join the Discussion in  Our Forums
 Community
MedTech1 Forums
 Advocacy Center
Contact Congress
Find a Patient Group
 Bookmark Us
 
advertisement
Search the Body1 Network
April 20, 2019  
MEDTECH NEWS: Latest Headlines

  • Print this Article
  • Email this Article
  • Links/Reprints
  • Discuss this Article
  • FDA Panel Recommends Lifting Silicone Ban


    October 15, 2003

    WASHINGTON (AP) - Eleven years after most silicone-gel breast implants were prohibited, government advisers recommended on Wednesday that the ban be lifted despite lingering questions about safety and durability.

    But the Food and Drug Administration's advisers urged that Inamed Corp.'s sales be allowed only under certain conditions, including ensuring that all users get detailed brochures explaining the devices' known risks - such as a need for frequent reoperations for pain or breakage.

    Women will need annual exams to be sure their implants haven't silently begun leaking, the panel stressed. That will be expensive and hard to ensure, the scientists acknowledged, but crucial because implants can break without immediate symptoms and should be removed when that happens.

    "This is as important as your annual mammogram," said FDA adviser Barbara Manno, a Louisiana State University toxicologist.

    All implant recipients also must be enrolled in a registry to track their health.

    The vote was 9-6.

    The panel also said Inamed must do more research tracking women's health for 10 years after implants, a time when many say their devices begin breaking and causing painful disorders. So far, Inamed's research tracks women's health for three years.

    Still, after two days of debate, the panel ultimately agreed with Inamed's argument that it is not fair to restrict women's access to silicone implants when research suggests they break and cause other problems no more frequently than today's main alternative - implants filled with salt water.

    The decision came after emotional testimony pitting woman against woman: those who say implants broke inside their bodies to leave them permanently damaged and those who want implants they say feel more natural to repair cancer-ravaged breasts or make their breasts bigger.

    If women keep their implants long enough, they all may break eventually, panelists said.

    The question is how to tell: Saline-filled implants deflate so fast that women know they've broken, but silicone leaks slowly and may not cause immediate symptoms. Because women may not be able to get all the leaking silicone out of their bodies, "we have to hold this to a different standard," argued adviser Dr. Amy Newburger, a New York dermatologist.

    The FDA ended routine sales of silicone breast implants in 1992, restricting them to breast cancer patients in strictly controlled clinical trials.

    Seeking to restart broader sales, Inamed Corp. argued that the implants have been exonerated.


    Last updated: 15-Oct-03

       
    Interact on Medtech1
    DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE
    Ask a question or share your opinions on this topic with others in the Body1 community.
     
    Latest Headlines Archives
    Going for Gold With a Novel Interventional Radiology Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer

    Foam Bones: A New Generation of Biomedical Implants

    Tongue-Controlled Wheelchair Holds Hope for the Quadriplegics and Others

    Can ‘Report Cards’ on Clinics Improve Patient Care?

    Going out Green – Boomers Reinvent the Funeral Industry

    Next 5 Features ...

    More Headlines ...

     
    Home About Us Press Jobs Advertise With Us Contact Us
    advertisement
    © 2019 Body1 All rights reserved.
    Disclaimer: The information provided within this website is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for consultation with your physician or healthcare provider. The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of the Owners and Sponsors of this site. By using this site you agree to indemnify, and hold the Owners and Sponsors harmless, from any disputes arising from content posted here-in.